Today's Most Watched Stories
- Putin faces isolation over Syria as G8 ratchets up pressure
- Eurozone crisis live: Greek leaders begin crucial meeting over state broadcaster
- Iran’s new president hails ‘victory of moderation’
- Stock markets slide as strike begins in Greece – eurozone crisis live
- U.N. says Syrian government and rebels recruit children to fight
- Subscribe to Site-wide RSS Feed
- Subscribe to TOP NEWS feed rss
Category Archives: Banking
Eight questions the Co-operative Bank needs to answer
As controversy over Co-op Bank’s £1.5bn rescue deal rumbles on, Patrick Collinson poses eight questions customers want answered
1. What were the commercial loans that caused so much misery?
Co-op Bank has been laid low by 12 big loans which together account for £900m of the £1.7bn of ‘impaired’ loans on its books. But who were these loans to? Small investors who have lost half the money in their PIBS (permanent interest bearing shares) rightly want to know where their money has gone. Defunct shopping centres? Collapsed property developers? Co-op Bank has never revealed the recipients of its loans, although other ‘ethical’ banks such as Triodos make much of the transparency of their lending decisions.
2. Were the problems really just at Britannia, the building society the Co-op Bank took over in 2009?
Co-op Bank inherited what turned out to be a mountain of bad debts as a result of its merger with Britannia building society in 2009. Apart from the dodgy commercial loans, it is also suffering arrears on its £7.5bn-worth of “Optimum” mortgages that a subsidiary of Britannia known as Platform sold through intermediaries. But is it convenient for the management of Co-op Bank to distance itself from problems at the group by blaming the Britannia rather than themselves?
3. Who at Britannia was paid to oversee lending and risk controls?
The chief executive of Britannia was Neville Richardson, who went on to become chief executive of Co-op Bank. He quit the group in 2011, and a year later it was revealed that he was paid a total of £4.6m, including £1.4m as “compensation for loss of office” and a lump sum pension of £2.1m.
The non-executive chairman of Britannia in 2009, Rodney Baker-Bates (paid £101,000 a year), proclaimed in the society’s 2008 report and accounts: “We remain financially strong during these difficult times.” In the same report, Richardson said the Platform loans, even the ‘self-cert’ type, were “low risk” with the “right risk profile and right pricing”.
The group finance director at the time was David McCarthy, who was previously finance director of Bank of Ireland UK. He joined halfway through the year and was paid a basic salary of £128,000 for six-and-a-half months’ work. The accounts for Britannia were audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers.
Savers whose permanent interest bearing shares have now been all but wiped out must now be asking why these highly paid officers of the society were unable to see the impending impairment risks, especially as by the time of the merger, Northern Rock had already collapsed and the financial crisis was deepening.
4. The merger took place in 2009, with the financial crisis in full swing. Couldn’t the advisers spot the problems then?
The risks were virtually invisible among the back-slapping statements in the press release issued by City PR firm Brunswick at the time of the announcement in 2009. The merger would create a “super mutual” which would be “strongly capitalised and with scale and strength in product, distribution and service.”
Citigroup Global Markets were the investment bankers who advised Britannia, led by Chris Williams, an ex Goldman Sachs banker who previously worked on RBS’s takeover of NatWest. Co-op Bank’s advisers were JP Morgan Cazenove (JPMC), led by Tim Wise, who is now the company’s chairman. In 2008, JPMC paid bonuses of £85m to senior staff, but after it was fully acquired by JP Morgan in 2009 its bonus figures are subsumed under the group’s overall figures. The fees paid to advisers have not been disclosed, although Co-op Bank’s report and accounts include a figure of more than £50m for ‘strategic change initiative’ costs in 2009 and 2010.
5. Will the advisers who recommended the deal hand back the cash they earned?
Hmm. What do you think?
6. Why did the Co-op Bank waste millions pursuing the Verde deal to buy Lloyds bank branches when it had such problems in its own backyard?
A puzzling part of this whole story is why Co-op Bank was planning to quadruple in size with the takeover of a large chunk of Lloyds Bank at the same time as serious loan losses were mounting with the group. Again, the costs of the failed Verde bid have not yet been disclosed.
7. Will the board of Co-op Bank take pay cuts or hand back bonuses?
Bond holders have lost half their money, but there has been no indication yet that any senior staff at the Co-op will see their pay cut or bonuses clawed back. The bank chief executive, Barry Tootell, resigned after the savage Moody’s downgrade that revealed the bank’s problems. He was paid a total of £766,000 in 2011. New chief executive Euan Sutherland’s pay package has not yet been disclosed.
8. Can the Co-op Bank retain its status as an ethical bank if shareholders drive the company?
Shares in the Co-op Bank are to be listed on the stock market for the first time as part of the rescue deal to raise £1.5bn. It is a serious blow to the mutual sector which leaves Nationwide as the last major mutual on the high street. It also raises fears that the ethos of the Co-op may change for the worse. The Move Your Money campaign, which has been encouraging the public to switch from the major high street banks to the Co-op Bank, says it should become “not just another bank”.
We have put these questions to the Co-op Bank. Meanwhile customers seeking answers to these issues face a long wait, as the Co-operative group’s next annual general meeting is not until late April 2014.
guardian.co.uk © 2013 Guardian News and Media Limited or its affiliated companies. All rights reserved. | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds
Related posts:
Posted in Banking, Banks and building societies, Business, Co-operative Group, guardian.co.uk, Money, UK news, World news
Comments Off
Singapore is focus for latest rate-rigging scandal
Watchdog says 133 traders in 20 banks were involved and says no criminality but efforts showed ‘lack of ethics’
Financial regulators in Singapore have found 133 traders in 20 banks attempted to manipulate interest rate and foreign exchange benchmarks, with bailed-out Royal Bank of Scotland among those identified for the toughest punishment.
In a new development in the Libor-rigging scandal, which first erupted a year ago when Barclays was fined £290m for rigging the interest-rate benchmark, the Monetary Authority of Singapore said the banks had taken action against the traders involved, who had left, been demoted or denied bonuses. Their attempts to manipulate interest rates would be mentioned in job references, MAS said.
The traders were not found to have successfully manipulated interest rate benchmarks known as Sibor and Sor, or foreign exchange benchmarks, but were deemed to lack “professional ethics”.
“Although the number of traders involved represents a small proportion of the trading community in Singapore, MAS takes a serious view of the need to uphold high standards of integrity in the industry and expects banks to foster a culture of ethical conduct among all their employees,” the central bank said.
MAS forced banks to hold more capital on reserve in Singapore for a year, with RBS, Swiss bank UBS and Dutch bank ING required to hold more than the others – up to S$1.2bn (£610m). RBS and UBS have already been fined by authorities in the UK and US a total of £390m and £930m respectively for Libor rigging.
All the banks were also censured for deficiencies in governance, risk management and surveillance systems, and required to appoint an external assessor to ensure they change their systems.
Some of the cases had been referred for criminal investigation by the Commercial Affairs Department and the attorney-general’s chambers, MAS said, but the information available did not appear to show criminality had taken place.
About 100 of the traders had either resigned or been asked to quit while those who remained had been disciplined. Disciplinary measures included “reassignment to other jobs, demotions, and forfeiture of bonuses”, MAS said.
“The industry will put in place measures to facilitate reference checks, so that an institution would be made aware if a potential hire had been implicated in attempts to inappropriately influence benchmarks,” it added.
Bank of America, BNP Paribas and Oversea-Chinese Banking Corporation are each required to hold an extra S$800m while another group of banks, including Barclays and Standard Chartered, must retain up to an extra S$600m. Germany’s Commerzbank was on the list but not required to hold extra capital while another group, including Citibank and JP Morgan, was required to hold up to S$300n.
The action in Singapore comes in a week when the integrity of the hundreds of benchmarks used in financial markets was again called in to question when the City launched an investigation into potential manipulative traders in the currency markets.
The action by the Financial Conduct Authority, the new regulator for the City, became known after Bloomberg reported allegations that traders were putting in client orders ahead of a 60-second window when the benchmarks are set.
The FCA is continuing its investigation into Libor, with four other financial firms facing fines or other action while the parliamentary commission on banking standards, set up in the wake of the Barclays fine, is poised to publish its recommendations for reforming the City.
The parliamentary commission is expected to clamp down on City pay, with a 10-year deferral period for bonuses and measures to make bankers more accountable.
The FCA is also investigating manipulation of gas prices, while the European commission has raided the offices of BP, Shell and other oil companies to investigate allegations that oil prices had been rigged for more than a decade.
guardian.co.uk © 2013 Guardian News and Media Limited or its affiliated companies. All rights reserved. | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds
Related posts:
Posted in Asia Pacific, Banking, Business, Editorial, Libor, Singapore, The Guardian, World news
Comments Off
David Cameron plays down prospect of early RBS sell-off
I want taxpayers to get their money, says PM, as City headhunter starts search for Hester’s replacement
David Cameron appeared to play down the prospect of an early sell-off of Royal Bank of Scotland on Thursday even as the bailed-out bank kickstarted the search for Stephen Hester’s successor as chief executive.
RBS appointed City headhunter Anna Mann to seek candidates to lead the 81% taxpayer-owned bank through a privatisation that the bank believes could start next year.
But the prime minister told Bloomberg that he thought taxpayers were more interested in getting their money back than in seeing the bank returned swiftly to the private sector.
“It will take time, because this is a bank that is still healing,” he said. “As for when we get it back into the private sector, I just have two very simple concerns: one is we must make sure this bank contributes to the recovery of the UK economy. Secondly, people put their money in. I want them to get their money out.”
Shares in the 81% taxpayer-owned bank slumped as investors gave their first reaction to Hester’s surprise resignation, cushioned by a payoff of up to £5.6m, amid anxiety about political interference. Labour’s Treasury spokesman, Chris Leslie, attacked the government for a “shambolic and uncertain approach”.
A further scaling-back of the investment bank was announced on Thursday, involving 2,000 job cuts – 20% of the workforce. It has already been reduced from 24,000 under Hester’s tenure, which started at the time of the October 2008 bailout.
Uncertainty about the future leadership of the bank was compounded when chairman Sir Philip Hampton told Bloomberg that when Hester’s successor had been named, “other aspects of board succession will be addressed”. Hampton, chairman for just over four years, added that he had “no plans to step down at this stage”.
Despite reports that Hampton had been told by UK Financial Investments, which looks after the taxpayer’s stake in bailed-out banks, that the Treasury wanted to privatise RBS next year, the Treasury insisted there was no timetable for a sell-off.
In a statement to MPs, forced by Labour, Treasury minister Sajid Javid attempted to justify a payoff for Hester – a £1.6m contractual entitlement and up to £4m in share bonuses – by saying it was a third of what he was entitled to under a contract signed by the previous Labour government. He also said Labour had overpaid for RBS shares. Javid told MPs the government had no target price for the sell-off and no fixed timetable and was not eyeing the May 2015 general election.
The shares, down 7% at one stage, ended the day more than 3% lower at 315p after Javid’s statement, wiping nearly £1bn off the bank’s value and making it the biggest faller on the FTSE 100.
The government is awaiting publication of the report by the parliamentary commission on banking standards before setting out its strategy for the banks in next week’s Mansion House speech. The report is complete but a publication date has not yet been set, although Pat McFadden, the Labour MP who sits on the commission, told Javid it did not contain a “permission slip” to sell off RBS on the cheap.
In appointing Mann to find Hester’s replacement, Hampton is turning to one of the City’s best-known headhunters. She founded Whitehead Mann but now runs WMW Consulting.
As RBS announced another overhaul of its investment bank following a £390m fine for rigging Libor, Hester wrote to staff to thank them for their support since he was parachuted in to replace the ousted Fred Goodwin.
“Five years is a long time for anyone to serve as chief executive. The endless scrutiny we all face carries a cost, but it has always been offset for me by the warmth and support of colleagues from across the business to carry on,” Hester said. “RBS lost sight of why it was founded, and it nearly died as a result. We’ve got back to a place where we can once again focus on the customer above all else. If there is one positive legacy to take from our past mistakes it must be that we never, ever forget why we are here,” he said. Investment bankers were told that the bank was further retrenching from overseas and pulling out of risky operations such as complex derivatives. “Our aim is to streamline the business, reduce complexity, mitigate operational risk and improve the way in which we manage our activities front-to-back,” said the newly appointed heads of the investment bank, Peter Nielsen and Suneel Kamlani. The pair, appointed after John Hourican quit in the wake of the Libor fine, have effectively created a mini “bad bank” for the operations being run off.
The latest job cuts signalled the restructuring of a key RBS unit ahead of a privatisation that Hester said could take years.
guardian.co.uk © 2013 Guardian News and Media Limited or its affiliated companies. All rights reserved. | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds
Related posts:
Posted in Banking, Business, Editorial, guardian.co.uk, Royal Bank of Scotland, Stephen Hester, UK news, World news
Comments Off
Public must get share of Lloyds and RBS sell-offs, says Lib Dem MP
Stephen Williams warns coalition that Lib Dem MPs will not stand by and watch private investors reap all the benefits
A Liberal Democrat MP has put the party’s coalition partners on notice that attempts to sell Royal Bank of Scotland and Lloyds Banking Group through a traditional privatisation could run into resistance.
Amid heightening debate about the future of the two bailed-out banks, Stephen Williams, who was the first Lib Dem MP to lend his support to the distribution of shares to all taxpayers, said: “My Lib Dem colleagues and I will not stand by and watch private investors reap all of the benefits once the banks are taken off taxpayer intensive care. The public must get their share.”
He issued his remarks after the Policy Exchange thinktank built on the original idea he supported, which was devised by corporate financiers Portman Capital Partners. The idea involves allowing up to 48m taxpayers to apply for shares in RBS and Lloyds, possibly worth £1,650 per person, which they would pay for later. There would be a sell-off of shares to big City institutions and retail investors alongside the distribution to taxpayers, to raise immediate cash.
To signal a disposal of part of the 39% stake in Lloyds or 81% stake in RBS, Chancellor George Osborne may have to decide on whether a sell-off would represent value for money for the taxpayer. UK Financial Investments, which manages the bank stakes for the taxpayer, has regarded break-even on the taxpayer stakes as 502p for RBS and 73.6p for Lloyds. But Policy Exchange produced figures which reduced those prices to 360p for RBS and 51p for Lloyds, by factoring in fees the banks have already paid.
RBS shares were up 2% at 334p yesterday while Lloyds slipped 1% to 61.5p amid reports that the government could hope to sell off a stake in Lloyds before the end of the year.
Osborne, who could use his Mansion House speech next week to spell out his intention to privatise one or both of the banks, may find a sell-off of Lloyds easier to justify and could favour a 1980s-style privatisation in which shares are sold to the public and big City institutions.
He could also give his response in the Mansion House speech to the report by the parliamentary commission on banking standards. The 10 members of the commission met on Monday afternoon and were due to resume on Tuesday to try to reach agreement on a report expected to recommend a clampdown on City pay and moves to make it easier to jail bankers, and could examine the future structure of RBS.
Williams, who urged Osborne to back his proposal where all members of the public get the chance to participate, said “returning the bailed out banks to the private sector will become a feature of the last years of the coalition”.
guardian.co.uk © 2013 Guardian News and Media Limited or its affiliated companies. All rights reserved. | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds
No related posts.
Posted in Banking, Business, Editorial, Lloyds Banking Group, Royal Bank of Scotland, The Guardian, UK news, World news
Comments Off




